Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why codify 6 Bits on the lenses?
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:09:53 +0100
References: <030120090123.21572.49A9E37C000C489700005444223245003003010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

Thank again Gene,

Yes, very slightly, but the picture I've showed is just as it is,  
without any manipulation.

The tonal rendition will be probably more equilibrated with the coded  
lens.

Cheers
lluis


El 01/03/2009, a las 2:23, grduprey at mchsi.com escribi?:

>
>
> Lluis,
>
>
> Looks fine to me.  there may be a slight Cyan shift visible on the  
> white post, upper right, if so, coding the lens will fix that.  As  
> you know I used my coded 21/2.8 without the filter, and had very  
> good luck with it, shooting over there.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Gene
>
>
>
> -------------- Original message from Lluis Ripoll <luisripoll at 
> telefonica.net 
> >: --------------
>
>
>> I've do this test with the Elmarit 21/2,8 uncoded, and with UV/IR
>> filter, I have not registered the exposure but it probably was at 2,8
>> or 4.
>>
>> The picture is as it was shot, in DNG mode, no other manipuation.
>>
>> IMO I can't appreciate any vigneting or deffect, what do you think?
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Barcelona/L1000661.jpg.html
>>
>> Thanks for yours opinions
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information