Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2009/04/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] G10
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:27:39 -0700
References: <0583B3CD-FCEC-410E-87B6-143026B0BDA2@charter.net> <p06230929c61d08511872@[10.0.1.199]> <B9939152-CE81-4146-9230-521F7C824CFA@charter.net> <p0623092ac61d5b4a8ad7@[10.0.1.199]>
I flash fill when necessary, and I rarely take images
surreptitiously, so the low light function is not a concern.
The P/S needs to at least marginally match an APS-C made image in
reproduction.
I don't think we're there yet with the products that are out now.
For now, I'll wait for the next generation of P/S.
S.d.
On Apr 28, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Henning Wulff wrote:
> The DMC G1 certainly provides better image quality than the G10
> under any conditions, and the Fuji F200EX also does better....
Replies:
Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] G10)
In reply to:
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] G10)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] G10)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] G10)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] G10)