Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/04/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] G10
From: nod at bouncing.org (Philip Clarke)
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:50:53 +0100
References: <C61EAAE8.4D8DF%mark@rabinergroup.com>

http://mikekingphoto.com/awards/ ask him about Phil.

Mark Rabiner wrote:
> RIGHT a real sports photographer who spends 23,635.17 dollars or ?16,000 on
> gear per year that's a fig Newton of someone's internet imagination.
>
> A sports photographer as in he's in the phonebook under photography and it
> says sports?
> or he's a software computer guy who gets paid for a shot a couple times a
> year so he can write off his gear.
>
> Or a real sports photographer who has a big expensive fast lens maybe and
> has up upgrade his DSLR once a year?
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>   
>> From: Philip Clarke <nod at bouncing.org>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 03:06:03 +0100
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] G10
>>
>>
>> There is two sides to every story (I'm talking about image quality). I
>> have a friend, he's a sport's photographer (international) and he spends
>> about ?16,000 a year on equipment (this was more before the British
>> pound collapsed). His theory which has been borne out by the awards he
>> received, was that he needed to best equipment *always* because if the
>> pictures passed over a pcture
>>     
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>   



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] G10)