Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]when appropriate, nathan, would appreciate hearing of the balance of the 1.2 on the m8. i'm wondering about trading my summilux in; but i love the balance and size of this latter, thanx, b. On 15-mei-2009, at 21:49, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > Thanks to everyone who replied, on and off list. I decided to get > the 1.2/35mm and thanks to the magic of Paypal and e-mail Stephen > Gandy will get in on its way to Alicante tomorrow. > > Of course, I already have an excellent 35mm lens, but given the > difference between 1.2 and 2.5 and my affinity for dark bar > interiors, it will be very handy to have this lens. > > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > On May 15, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: > >> I know at least some of you use the 1.2/35mm on the M8, and >> perhaps someone out there also uses the 1.4/40mm. What are your >> experiences? What framelines does the 40 bring up? Those using the >> 1.2/35mm--did you have it coded (obviously, not by Leica) and do >> you use it with an UV/IR filter? >> >> TIA, >> Nathan >> >> Nathan Wajsman >> Alicante, Spain >> http://www.frozenlight.eu >> http://www.greatpix.eu >> http://www.nathanfoto.com >> >> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information