Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:00:21 +0530
References: <C6482121.4F42E%mark@rabinergroup.com> <65269415-467B-4835-8FA7-395EE79470EC@gmail.com>
 
Ming,
Why should that make a difference, or matter at all? After all all of
us have our own preferences on how sharp a print should look. Are both
prints good, and artifact free at the end of the process? That is all
that should matter!
Cheers
Jayanand


On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 7:41 AM, Thein Onn Ming <mingthein at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> I still sharpen the M8, but not very much - typically something like
> 100/0.3/0 using PS CS3 smart sharpen, as opposed to 200/0.4/0 and then
> another pass of 100/0.2/0 with the D3's output. Quite a big difference...
>
Replies: Reply from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
 In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Message from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)