Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/05/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:57:21 -0400
 
It sure seems like magic but it does not look like me like the mother of
invention though that might be true. It looks to me like a cleaning off of
the Vaseline on the lens.
I did it a million times scanning before I even bought a digital camera.
I do it before I finish any image which I get from anywhere.
And I'd bet I'd use it while finishing an image from an M8.

The S system might have an optional filter system.


Mark William Rabiner



> From: Aram Langhans <leicar at q.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 08:28:02 -0700
> To: <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
> 
> Mark.  Actually, both columns are starting on the starting line,  It is 
> just
> that the ones w/o the AA filter have a shorter race.  They are much closer
> to the finish line.
> Sharpening invents information.
> 
> Aram
>
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] M8 Sharpening filter use - was: full sized samples)
Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
Reply from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)
 In reply to: Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)