Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:40:41 -0400
 
Oh absolutely we need to have our prints on the table as Doug is saying.
Photography is not a conversational art.
Its a visual art with concrete results.


Mark William Rabiner



> From: George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 09:24:42 -0500
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples
> 
> ;~)
> 
> If we're going to toss out theory and scientific method;
> 
> then let us actually name this
> "so and so famous photographer
> gallery up the street
> in which city"
> 
> and then discuss his or her actual equipment and work flow
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: D3x vs. 'Blad CFV 16MP full sized samples)