Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:15:49 -0500
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E95D0@case-email.casefoods.com> <8D441F08-A3C2-4399-9072-23E0DDF3C858@cox.net> <p0623090ac64a26cf9ee9@10.0.1.199> <8BFF4EFE-F7E1-4804-B0F3-B25ED454FE3B@cox.net> <36172e5a0906012232n225ff0acg55dd249ae410ca0e@mail.gmail.com> <4A24C410.4030905@sfr.fr> <A197E35B-97C1-493A-A4D6-FDD78869CAB8@cox.net> <36172e5a0906020941r257709cch4f705c3956cc3951@mail.gmail.com> <D73E99D6-2BDF-4FFF-B586-C60D77E4B757@cox.net>

Traditionally - perhaps.

If you saw Geoff's recent print shared in the print exchange
you may think differently about the M8 as a landscape tool.

I'm not sure how large a print he could take it to.
But at 8x10 it looks like a contact print from an 8x10 negative.

Stunning really.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist





On Jun 2, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Steve Barbour wrote:

> this is a terribly interesting discussion Geoff, and the points you  
> mention, really get me thinking further about something I already  
> deeply believe,
>
> the quest for technical excellence above spontaneity and content  
> would certainly force me to consider large format, super large  
> negatives, or whatever  :-)  , as well as a tripod...
>
> striving for that level of pure technical excellence, would not  
> have me using a hand held camera with a cropped sensor, designed  
> for quick and discrete street shooting, capturing spontaneity...
>
> as I see it, these are  two quite different goals, the  
> accomplishment of each one being very difficult, and the where  
> withall to do each, at cross purposes...
>



Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Reply from mingthein at gmail.com (Thein Onn Ming) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Salgado in Sunday NY Times)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (Philippe Amard) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Salgado now great image/camera ?)