Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 6x7 Enlarger?
From: dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella)
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:01:51 -0400
References: <7ac27f4f0906021917k303741dal34c9b8218b28687f@mail.gmail.com> <4A272D69.80705@cox.net> <9B584CFF-8B3F-4103-8429-EF65E4C0F1FD@charter.net> <7ac27f4f0906031926x3e7aea90gf17b9fa9fefbe4bd@mail.gmail.com> <ee8fa51c0906032348x4b5c5c5am3f2277f45deb1316@mail.gmail.com> <7ac27f4f0906032354r43486b64w3b2bca9f3dc25a0f@mail.gmail.com>

Richard, the "new" M605 did 6x7.  I think it was called the M605  
classic and was last sold in the 1990s.  The original one only did 6x6.

Dante

On Jun 4, 2009, at 2:54 AM, Richard Man wrote:

> The guy is offering throwing in the kitchen sink: 2 lens (105 and 50),
> trays, washer, the whole shebang!!
>
> Makes it tempting. Too bad my M605 only does 6x6. I didn't think I'd  
> do 6x7
> a few years ago...
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Marty Deveney <benedenia at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>>>> I use an Omega B8. It will also do 6x9.
>>> That's what I used back when I did wet printing. It is a great  
>>> enlarger.
>>
>> I can vouch for that, absolutely.  I can also confirm that if
>> carefully disassembled and shipped, the Omegas reassemble at the  
>> other
>> end easily and retain their regidity and alignment (this is not  
>> always
>> the case for all enlargers).  This place:
>> http://www.classic-enlargers.com/ is a great resource for them.
>>
>> I second Slobodan's comments both about most Beseler 23s needing a
>> rebuild and about the Saunders/LPL enlargers seeming flat-ish.  Most
>> of my 'grade 3' 35mm negs need grade 3.5-4 on an LPL, leaving you
>> little room to go up in case of an accidentally flat neg.
>>
>> I'd imagine you could easily get something for much less than you
>> indicate the Saunders/LPL is going for, particularly living in the  
>> US.
>>
>> Durst M70s are tremendous and Dante's suggestion of a 605 is also  
>> very
>> good.  Make sure you get your neg carriers with your enlarger unless
>> you already have a source with parts - they are increasingly hard to
>> find for out-of-production machines (e.g. *all* Dursts).
>>
>> A VC or colour head is unnecessary but nice.  Below the lens gel VC
>> filters work just fine and you can dodge with them, providing a  
>> useful
>> amount of local contrast control.  If you keep them clean and dry  
>> they
>> will not degrade image quality.
>>
>> Big prints from good 6x7 negs are a joy to behold and carefully made
>> Acros, TMX and Delta 100 negs can have you fooling your friends you
>> have gone seriously big with large format.  Send us the invite to the
>> show.
>>
>> Marty
>>
>
> -- 
> // richard m: richard @imagecraft.com
> // w: http://www.rfman.com
> // b: http://rfman.wordpress.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 6x7 Enlarger?)
Message from durling at cox.net (Mike Durling) ([Leica] 6x7 Enlarger?)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] 6x7 Enlarger?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 6x7 Enlarger?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] 6x7 Enlarger?)
Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] 6x7 Enlarger?)