Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/06/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Sculpture detail (Version 2)
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:44:01 -0700
References: <55AD39AD-724C-4273-AF78-5A855833BFEA@telefonica.net>

On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:39 PM, Lluis Ripoll wrote:

> Some ones has recommend me to do a second version more dense, this  
> is the second version
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/L1004472-3bw.jpg.html
> http://tinyurl.com/qor6dc
>
> the original version was this one
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/L1004472-1bw.jpg.html
> http://tinyurl.com/p9uslj
>
> Personnally I prefer the first version


me too...but I note Lluis that while the second version is more dense  
in some places, it is more contrasty, and thus is more overexposed in  
other places...


Steve

> , your opinions will be welcome, thank you
>
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
> Blog:
> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
>
> http://www.lrmusic.es
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Sculpture detail (Version 2))
In reply to: Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Sculpture detail (Version 2))