Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/08/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 vs. M9--better printers needed
From: chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:10:59 -0400
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20090821174717.029b35c0@med.cornell.edu> <C6B49826.5345E%mark@rabinergroup.com>
 
Mark, Your printing process apparently isn't physical enough.  When 
using an inkjet printer I have to keep the windows closed next to my 
desk or make sure the thing is bolted down.


At 06:29 PM 8/21/2009, you wrote:
> > Those things go for about $30K.  Nice.  Sort of takes the wind out of
> > all that inking for me anyway  A machine I could love, unlike an ink
> > jet printer  I could never love one of those too messy.  In 10 years
> > I'll pick up a used one for 5 years worth of ink I didn't have to
> > buy.  I'm not biased...really.
> >
> >
>
>
>Inkjet printers messy?
>
>If I ever got any ink on me ever I cant think of when it was in  10 years of
>Inkjetting.
>
>Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] M8 v M9--better printers needed)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 vs. M9--better printers needed)