Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re. Canon f1.2 50mm - Now LUG Gallery Down??
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 10:00:13 -0500
References: <100820091457.22153.4ACDFDDC0002A36600005689223045151403010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

Same here, Gene.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <grduprey at mchsi.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re. Canon f1.2 50mm - Now LUG Gallery Down??


>
>
> Is the LUG Gallery down today?  I cannot get in to view anybodies photos 
> this morning.
>
>
> Gene
>
> -------------- Original message from Peter Klein 
> <pklein at threshinc.com>: --------------
>
>
>> Larry:  I have a Canon 50/1.2  It is pretty much as you describe it.
>> The M8 cuts off the worst part, but the lens is still a compromise
>> design.  Sometimes this is "character," and sometimes its just plain
>> soft.  I have a relatively clean and good sample.  I would probably sell
>> it if I find a decent deal on a Konica 50/1.2 or the new Nokton 50/1.1,
>> or if I ever score a Noctilux at a garage sale...  Meanwhile, I have it,
>> and it's fast.
>>
>> That said, a little local contrast enhancement or selective sharpening
>> makes things right.  Focusing is tricky, to help this, the focus ring
>> has a long throw like the Noctilux.  It's probably best to "rough" set
>> the focus ring, then sway your body to fine-tune the focus.
>>
>> Here's a decent one, wide open, with the local contrast boosted a 
>> bit.http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/family/PetersBday2007/L1002325-w.jpg.htm
>> l
>> And a few more, wide 
>> open:http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/L1002263KatyaRead50-1_2-w.jpg.h
>> tml
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/album170/L1002212KatyaKitchen50-1_2-w.jp
>> g.html
>> http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/musicians/L1002312HokansonChord-w.html
>> http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/musicians/L1002314HokansonBow-W.html
>>
>> Stopped down, it's quite decent, just a little local highlight bleed and
>> veiling flare. This is a drastic crop, about 50% magnification (1:2)--I
>> had just come out of a dark pub, and spotted this across the street, no
>> time to change lenses, so I just shot.  f/11, I think:
>> http://users.2alpha.com/~pklein/currentpics/Spyglass-w.html
>>
>> A lens hood is a must.  I got a cheap 55mm screw-in.
>>
>> Hope this helps!
>> --Peter
>>
>> lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com)
>>  >Has anyone tried the Canon f1.2 50mm lens on an M8 or a micro 3/4
>> camera? I have a pristine Canon lens with a Leica screw
>>  >mount that I used with an adaptor on an M3 years ago. Wide open the
>> lens was soft but OK for available light work except
>>  >that the corners of the image were fuzzy. It seems that if only the
>> central portion of image circle is used, the lens might be good >for
>> interior work. Unfortunately I have no suitable digital camera to try it
>> out. Larry Z
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Re. Canon f1.2 50mm - Now LUG Gallery Down??)