Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:38:08 -0700
References: <27649946.1256005943935.JavaMail.root@wamui-haziran.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <5D25120D-E811-443E-9F27-F57DB6864979@gmail.com> <D94F37E3-6BEB-42B6-B4BF-68552FA6F3CC@frozenlight.eu>

I don't get it.... why does anyone intentionally require  "fake pixels"?
What good are they?
Is it a printing thing?

Frank Filippone
red735i at earthlink.net

They just care about the number of pixels. You can  
create fake pixels in Photoshop or more specialized tools to bump up  
the file size to the 50 MB usually required.

Nathan





Replies: Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)