Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not
From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:32:23 -0400 (EDT)

Steve Barbour wrote:

>On Oct 19, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
>
>> 48 MB files are the minimum for most.  More and more are using lists  
>> of acceptable and unacceptable cameras.  Leica M8s and M9s are on  
>> everybody's acceptable list.  Point and shoots are not.  Any cameras  
>> below 10MP are not.  They look at the photo's EXIF and if the camera  
>> is not acceptable, they don't even review the photo.  If you are  
>> very careful about how you interpolate, photos from a 10MP camera  
>> like the M8 are acceptable, but you can't do much cropping or high  
>> ISO work at all to be accepted.
>
>so this takes the place of..."whether it's a good photo?"   &    
>"whether it has anything to say?"
>

Nope.  In addition to "whether it's a good photo?" & "whether it has 
anything to say?".  There are bazillions of photos saying something, given a 
choice between a poorly-executed photo and another of equivalent content, 
but well-executed, poor technique doesn't win.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com




Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Easy decisions for M9 or not)