Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] LR3 - is it good enough yet?
From: zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:07:02 -0500
References: <4A55CF59-AB2F-4D79-9021-085A16FD8F56@me.com>

Wade at www.heninger.org  has stated some recent bugs. As a LR designer, I 
tend to pay attention to what he says.

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gerry Walden" Subject: [Leica] LR3 - is it good enough yet?


>I wondered if others felt that LR3 is good enough NOW for working on 
>images and uploading to the internet, keywording etc. I appreciate the 
>print module may not be, but then I do not use that under normal 
>circumstances. It is certainly better with noise and colour on my nefs 
>than LR2.
>
> Gerry
>
> Gerry Walden LRPS
> +44 (0)23 8046 3076
> Web: www.gwpics.com
> Blog: www.stockuk.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information 



In reply to: Message from gwpics at me.com (Gerry Walden) ([Leica] LR3 - is it good enough yet?)