Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] You can't kick around the Nikon D3 anymore.....
From: drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:27:18 -0500

I'd like my D700. A lot! I like using R lenses on it. In fact, that's
all I use, except for the 45P Nikkor which finds its way on the camera
now and then.  

I chose the D700 over an M8. It was a coin toss decision. I think I'd
have been happy either way. I couldn't justify both. I thought the D700
would be more versatile. It is, but turns out I rarely use zooms and
long lenses. 

With Leica primes the D700 isn't cumbersome. At least, not like it is
with a 17-35/2.8 zoom. I've discovered that it's not the camera so much
as what you put on the camera. With a D3, it may be the camera too. 

I took some Autumn landscapes recently. I used a tripod with live view
focusing. R lenses really are special. You'll never see it on a web
image, or small enlargement. But when you explore an image at full
resolution there's a certain wow factor.  

I'm not a big fan of Nikon Capture NX2, but it does a bang up job of
converting RAW files. I want to shoot JPEG but I keep going back to RAW.


Nikon has come a long way in a few years. My D100 took a while to digest
after with 3 exposures in short succession. And the waiting time for
processing compressed RAW was long. You can't feed the D700 fast enough.
I'm a methodical shooter so it's not something I really need. But it's
there if I need it.  

I'm still waiting for the perfect camera or unlimited financial
resources. Again, I'd take either and be happy. :-)

Dave R


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+drodgers=casefarms.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Mark Rabiner
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:41 AM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] You can't kick around the Nikon D3 anymore.....

> According to the B+H Site, the Nikon D3 has been discontinued.
Nothing
> seems to confirm this on the Nikon Site.....
> 
> Look for the D3S ..... at $5200......
> 
> 
> Frank Filippone
> red735i at earthlink.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
A D3  new at Adorama for $4,899.00
Nikon has apparently found that the D3 needed an S. for $5,199.95.

You wanna cut rate nikon full frame?
Get a stinkin  el cheapo D700 like everybody else. $3,366.95

Mark William Rabiner

The Leica M9s will be cheaper not more expensive.




_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] You can't kick around the Nikon D3 anymore.....)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] You can't kick around the Nikon D3 anymore.....)