Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG & RAW????
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:39:20 -0800
References: <83E99E8D-A0BF-4C04-81E3-2780799D87EE@gmail.com> <C71E856F.584BF%mark@rabinergroup.com> <00f201ca6210$9ee00240$dca006c0$@net> <16094F5A-9F8F-4AF0-98DB-EC96D849D31B@gmail.com> <8DD2D9BC569441A3B1D94E6BD93C6784@syneticfeba505> <BFD7A713DD4D4BB29AD2EC3ECF31D6D5@LENOVO73EC0E2F>

Hi Jim,
I'm assuming your question is for me? Dr. ted? If it is electronically timed 
I'm sure it happens! 
But many of the things that are brought up are not worth bothering about if 
the photographer is totally consummed with shooting the moment!  And just 
got on with their picture taking it really wouldn't make any difference!

I have a question back, why in all "common sense," never mind wishy washy 
reasons, would one shoot RAW & JPEG at the same time?" I see that as a 
complete waste of card space and battery waste. Not to forget it's double 
the editing time later? Anyone?

Particularly when they feel the camera isn't functioning in a manner they 
don't like, why do it and set the camera to work in both JPEG & RAW? A 
fashion that it only angers the user??

cheers,
Dr. ted 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim" <jimlong5 at charter.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses"


> So when the digital journalist article said there is a 3.6 to 3.7 second 
> pause needed between fine and basic JPG files, that's not true?
> 
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <tedgrant at shaw.ca>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:21 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses"
> 
> 
>> Frank Filippone wrote:
>>> >> Yes.  But not exactly the tool for the decisive moment.......Human, 
>>> >> birdie,
>>>> Lion, or otherwise......
>>
>> Steve Barbour offered:
>>> why Frank, and how do you know?
>>>  here...
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/barbour/PAW+2009/handymanbw.jpg.html
>>
>> Great shot Steve, "Action at it's best! :-)
>>
>> Gentlemen may I interject for a moment? Thank you.
>> I've never found any delay because I don't think about that kind of stuff 
>> ~!!!!! ERGO! it doesn't happen! ;-) Jeeesh some of you guys are worry 
>> warts! :-)
>>
>> It's quite simple really.... if you guys stopped thinking about all this 
>> techie stuff and tried this system!
>>
>> "SEE -- SHOOT!"  faster than I type this, you wouldn't have time to think 
>> about all this lag stuff.
>>
>> Quite frankly if you guys hadn't brought this up I'd have never thought 
>> it 
>> was happening, "THAT IS IF IT DOES?????" Concentrate on image/shooting 
>> and 
>> forget about the camera in hand!
>>
>> Is there a wild possibility some of you are getting older and the lagtime 
>> is your own mental lagtime?  :-) :-) :-)
>>
>> But here is a tiny solid tip of advice to eliminate your imagined 
>> lagtime, 
>> period!
>>
>> Buy a Tom Abrahamson "SOFT RELEASE"! Screw it into the shutter release 
>> and 
>> you wont have time to think about anything because you will have released 
>> almost by thought process! Blink your eyes, picture taken! :-)
>>
>> You don't believe it? If you don't have it in the release and using it, 
>> (me 2 years experience time)  don't tell me it wont make any difference 
>> because you're only wasting your time and mine!
>>
>> The release worked beautifully on film M's and sure as hell is a super 
>> fast release for M digital cameras!
>> Yer welcome I knew you'd appreciate it. :-)
>>
>> Dr. ted.
>> "one of the unwashed masses! "
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.425 / Virus Database: 270.14.60/2495 - Release Date: 11/10/09 
19:56:00


Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG &RAW????)
Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses" JPEG & RAW????)
In reply to: Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")
Message from jimlong5 at charter.net (Jim) ([Leica] M9 reviewers drawn from the "unwashed masses")