Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] S2 test
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:52:26 -0500

> None of my system shoots B and W medium format film suitable for head
> portrait, but it's OK, we know you read what you want to read :-)
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/13/09, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>>> I thought the context is someone (I.e. Me) looking for a camera body
>>> and a couple lens for certain purpose. I don't do macro with it as
>>> digital is more convenient for that purpose. My goal is to shoot B and
>>> W film printed in the darkroom.
>> 
>> 
>> Any of those 4 camera systems you mentioned you own can fit a short
>> telephone lens to shoot a portrait with.
>> Lenes are available for sale without a body attached to it.
>> The need to buy a 5th system to  shoot a portrait goes right over my head.
>> 
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
Below are your systems you  just mentioned I just pasted in and I'm not
seeing one which would not work fine with a tele on the front of it for
portraits.
Not one.
You don't need a tenth camera system to enable you to shoot a head shot.
 
> Still have my OM-4T, bought 1986
> Still have my M7, bought ... 2003/2004
> Still have my XPan
> Still have my E-3
> Still have my Mamiya 7II
> Still have my M8.u
> 
> Not many chances that I will sell any of the above.
> 
> Cameras I have bought and sold:
> - M6
> - MP <-- would have kept that one, but need to pay bills more than I
> need a camera.
> - R-D1 <-- would have kept this one too, but see above.


Mark William Rabiner





Replies: Reply from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] S2 test)
Reply from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 test)
Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] S2 test)
In reply to: Message from richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] S2 test)