Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/11/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] S2 test
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:19:21 -0800
References: <C723E1C6.58B15%mark@rabinergroup.com> <62E0DFBF-F5D5-4E06-95A7-16D4BB3DDEE4@btinternet.com>

I recently picked up a 360mm for my 4x5, to do just that, in this case  
harbor landscapes. Now, I just have to convince the Harbor Dept and  
the LAPD Harbor patrol that it's a benign photo essay.
S.d.


On Nov 14, 2009, at 4:39 AM, Frank Dernie wrote:

> I don't think many of these 210mm lenses got sold... OTOH I find  
> long lenses great for landscapes. I have seen so many dull, dull,  
> dull landscapes using WA lenses and massive foreground dullness.
> WA lenses are still horrid for people, even if current fashion may  
> be different in some places. WA is OK for architecture when you  
> can't get far enough away. Or for special effects fun.
> IMO
> Frank
> On 14 Nov, 2009, at 09:25, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>> Amazing! A long distance tele lens with guess to matic focusing now  
>> that's
>> plain odd! And barely possible!
>> I take it all back I know nothing. Long glass for hiking landscapes?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] S2 test)
Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] S2 test)