Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film & digital
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 08:56:39 +0100
References: <088CC2B3-F7C3-4C99-AD81-0550DE7DA14F@gmail.com>

Hola Lluis,

I think the second one is better, but not because it was shot on film--from 
a purely image quality point of view I think 1 is better. But the woman's 
expression in 2 makes it a better picture.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Dec 12, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:

> From last Summer, same situation, 2 cameras, 2 different lenses, film and 
> pixels...
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/L1008100BW.jpg.html
> M8, probably with Tri Elmar
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/2009060230.jpg.html
> M3, Zeiss Sonnar Opton, Ilford 50 ISO
> 
> What do you think?....
> 
> Thanks...
> 
> Saludos cordiales
> Lluis
> 
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
> Blog:
> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
> 
> http://www.lrmusic.es
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)