Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]True, the first Aperture was very slow and not very good compared to Lightroom. Aperture 2 is much much faster and works on iMacs and MacBooks. I don't know if the ratio is 1 to 100, but it might be considering that there is no Aperture for Windows... All the best from the south of France! Tarek ------------------------------------------------- Tarek Charara <http://www.pix-that-stimulate.com> NO ARCHIVE Le 2 janv. 10 ? 01:11, Mark Rabiner a ?crit : > I find it remarkable that this is the fist Aperture / Lightroom > thread I > ever recall happening on the LUG and I even brought it up once no > takers. > A reason being perhaps now that I check is the war is long over. > > A quick search engine check and Lightroom seems to have won the race > and is > now used on a more than 1 to a hundred basis over aperture. > The kids don't like it. Nor do the pros. > You check yourself. > > A major problem being with apples implementation of aperture you > cant use it > on an Macbook or iMac's. You need a towering inferno of a mainframe. > > And even pro's don't upgrade their computer to matched their latest > software; Somebody says. > > > > Mark William Rabiner > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information