Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 vs E3
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:52:19 +0100
References: <4B5F90CD.2040005@hemenway.com>

Yes Jim,

Both your pictures are really beautiful

Saludos
Lluis
El 27/01/2010, a las 2:03, Jim Hemenway escribi?:

> Richard Mann and others were discussing his E3 vs the Leica digital  
> cameras a few days ago... I'm relatively poor, so I don't have  
> either the M8 or M9. Assuming that they're better, I can still print  
> very convincing 11x14-ish sized prints from these:
>
> http://www.hemenway.com/OlympusE-510-with-Pentaxlens/
>
> For the $500 or so that I paid for it, the resulting prints look  
> very food.
>
> Still, I'd find a way to raise the dough if a full frame Leica DSLR  
> became available.
>
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] M9 vs E3)