Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Look, I never said I actively disliked it, only that I thought I had seen many better pictures from you. To be more specific, I would crop som of the dead space on the bottom, I am troubled by the girl cut in half on the left, and like others, I am not sure about the mother's look away from the frame. I am looking at this picture as a stand-alone image, it may well work better in a group. In any event, I do not pretend to be a worthwhile critic, I was just trying to make the point that you are relying on someone's else's preferences here. I have from time to time asked for advice (including here on the list), but in the end if that advice contradicts my own assessment, I go with the latter. Cheers, Nathan Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Tina Manley wrote: > I'd love a discussion since Rab says it's the best of mine he's seen and > Nathan doesn't like it! Two extremes right here, but all editing is > subjective, as Maggie said. ;-) > > Tina > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at > gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hey, now we have the start for a good picture critique discussion (with >> Tina's consent of course). >> Cheers >> Geoff >> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman >> >> >> Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >