Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I looked at two sources. Both said 5.49, for what that is worth. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] PIXEL PITCH SIZE > the two numbers came from two different sources. > I'm not sure which one is correct? > Just wasn't interested enough to track it down. > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > On Mar 2, 2010, at 11:49 AM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> It cold be when they use two numbers like that >> 5.49 - 5.54 size pixel >> There is something else going on. Maybe you're supposed to multiply >> them?!?!? > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >