Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for the feedback, Tina. Jim Nichols Tullahoma, TN USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tina Manley" <images at comporium.net> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:24 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] Crazy > Yes, the NYT does get checked for accuracy. I get it on my Kindle every > morning and there is always a corrections section with some of the most > minor corrections - usually just one letter wrong in spelling a name, for > example, but they also correct dates and figures that might have been > reported wrong. They seem to do a much better job than any of my local > papers which never make corrections for even gross mistakes. > > I really don't think removing the foot from that photo made any difference > in the message of the photo but there is always that slippery slope issue. > Where do you draw the line? Maybe removing a foot crosses that line? I'm > glad that somebody is paying attention. > > Tina > > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> > wrote: > >> They seem to take it to the point of being rediculous. I wonder if the >> NYT >> stories get checked as closely for accuracy? I know that the stories >> that I >> see in local publications have all sorts of errors. >> >> Jim Nichols >> >> > > > -- > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >