Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Right. Guidelines suggest a rational process by intelligent beings to make and/or qualify reasonable judgments . Determining that the saturation slider has gone too far; resulting in a professionals loss of job; seems like micro management to the absurd. A simple, "hey, cut back on the saturation Joe, probably would have worked." This comes down to pushing and pulling to determine where an arbitrary line should be drawn. When in reality - it shouldn't be a line; but rather a case by case rational evaluation. Who or what was harmed by this particular presentation of the visual information? Whatever happened to "common sense?" Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:56 PM, Tina Manley wrote: > <http://www.nppa.org/professional_development/business_practices/ > ethics.html>But > this contest was for the World Press which might have different > guidelines. > I still think about Patrick Schneider who was fired from the > Charlotte > Observer and lost the photographer of the year award for adding > saturation > to the colors in a photo.