Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica prices
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:25:25 -0600
References: <6a7544a61003090935h2718fcacy6bf5e67d0a3d0725@mail.gmail.com> <20100309133105.4a241b2f@linux-0ifi.site> <C360DA63-FF6B-45F2-9EB1-73F3B01210A7@mac.com> <20100309141734.055654b6@linux-0ifi.site>

I have no idea what age demographic is buying M9, .9 Noctilux, 21 mm  
Summilux, etc.
But I do know the economic demographic - it's the top of the economic  
food chain.

And if they happen to be old
they probably have kids
(and grandkids)
either with money
(or soon to inherit it
along with grandpa's Leica gear).

;~)

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:

> But how many of those M9's are going to new customers that Leica can
> look towards as a source of revenue for the next 40 years vice already
> established Leica users who are closer to or at retirement age?
> Yes, they are a smaller company but do they want the marque aimed at
> older photographers or do they want to gain a new generation of users?
>
> At the current prices, the number of people who are the children of
> baby boomers buying M9's and their flagship lenses can't be more than
> the low to mid double digits across the whole world. Yes, that's
> conjecture, but I think it's an honest, educated guess because I'm a
> part of that generation and know many photographers my age who  
> can't or
> won't touch new Leicas simply because of the price.
> Phil Forrest
>
>
>
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:00:40 -0600
> George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Depends who you ask;
>> whether you ask
>> those driving 20 year old Saturn's
>> or
>> those driving new BMWs MBs, Porsches, Escalades, etc.
>> the answers will be different.
>> ;~)
>>
>> Remember: Leica is a tiny company.
>> They don't have to sell huge quantities
>> (another reason the prices will remain high).
>> They can't fill M9 orders fast enough
>> in the worst economy and job market
>> in many decades.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:
>>
>>> Our question is will there be
>>> enough people in the coming 20 years who will both be financially
>>> able and willing to buy such ridiculously priced goods to keep
>>> Leica alive?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica prices)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica prices)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Leica prices)
Reply from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Leica prices)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Leica prices)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Leica prices)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Leica prices)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Leica prices)