Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] VF sizes
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:23:10 -0800
References: <mailman.855.1268285013.1001.lug@leica-users.org> <A76884FC9D914B5698BACB80B942BA84@SueHome> <a3f189161003112114w11c1462fv6f79600225739433@mail.gmail.com>

I don't know! If my M6ttl had been the same size as the original M6, I 
probably would of kept it. I was never happy with the extra bulk.
S.d.

On Mar 11, 2010, at 9:14 PM, Sonny Carter wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Sue Pearce <bs.pearce at cox.net> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, the D3 has a good but not great VF, but...
>> 
>> There's no reason that the contents of the M9 couldn't fit into the space
>> of the OM's. Even if slightly expanded, it would be sublime!
>> 
> 
> I dunno Bill, a buncha peeps griped when the M8 was a couple Millimeters
> bigger than the M7.   ;-)
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Sonny
> http://www.sonc.com
> http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
> Natchitoches, Louisiana
> (+31.754164,-093.099080)
> 
> USA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from bs.pearce at cox.net (Sue Pearce) ([Leica] VF sizes)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] VF sizes)