Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comments on GF-1
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:36:50 +0200
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36052E9AC6@case-email.casefoods.com> <D88AFA73-EA68-4BE6-8A79-A826CF7E6067@comcast.net>

I find 800 perfectly OK on mine most of the time. The "digital CL" is the 
perfect description of the GF-1 with the 1.7/20mm.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog






On Mar 30, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Richard Taylor wrote:

> You're going you love it.  I love mine.  I use it mostly below ISO 400. 
> 800 is OK - sometimes. and 1600 pretty much requires you go to B&W to hide 
> the chroma noise.   Congrats.  
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Dick
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 30, 2010, at 2:45 PM, David Rodgers wrote:
> 
>> I was in Portland last week and took advantage of the lack of sales tax
>> in Oregon. I bought a GF-1, 20/1.7 and EVF from Pro Photo Supply. 
>> 
>> I've been contemplating buying a Micro Four-Thirds camera for a while.
>> I'd read a lot, but hadn't handled any of the Micro Four-Thirds bodies.
>> I immediately liked the size and feel of the GF-1. The GH was nice, but
>> the GF-1 very much reminded me of using a CL.  
>> 
>> The beauty of the GF-1 is its small size. At the same time the image
>> quality -- though not on par with my D700 -- is more than adequate.
>> 
>> The only thing I found that I miss when using the GF-1 (vs the D700) is
>> low light capability. Maybe after I spend more time with the images I'll
>> miss the D700 image quality, too. But having a camera that's small (and
>> practical to take everywhere) is a worthy compromise, IMO.    
>> 
>> The 20/1.7 is a spectacular little lens, as others on the LUG can
>> attest. I ordered an M adapter and look forward to using M lenses (in
>> particular my 50/2.8 newer model Elmar "tele"). 
>> 
>> Though I almost passed on the optional EVF I'm very glad that I bought
>> it. It's been on the camera from the start. I took a few shots without
>> it, but I immediately put it back on. I like composing through a
>> viewfinder, and although the image isn't spectacular it's adequate. I
>> like seeing shooting info; especially the aperture. I use "A" mode
>> mostly and I can see it change when I rotate the thumbwheel.  
>> 
>> In summary, the GF-1 is a wonderful camera. For me it replaces a Fuji
>> P&S that I've had for several years, but was quite a bit out-dated (and
>> no where close to the image quality of the GF-1). I'll still use the
>> D700, but I anticipate not nearly as often as the GF-1.
>> 
>> Dave R    
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Comments on GF-1)
In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Comments on GF-1)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Comments on GF-1)