Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Most portable 135
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 10:31:46 -0500 (CDT)

Vince,

While I agree the Nikon 105/2.5 is a great lens, I had one many years ago, 
and certainly better than the 90 Elmar C, it does not outperform the 90 
Elmarit R, imho.

Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vince Passaro" <passaro.vince at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2010 9:42:56 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [Leica] Most portable 135

Also -- one more thought -- if you have a Nikon adapter already, the lens to
look for, and little more expensive, is the Nikkor 105/2.5.  I tested it the
other day on my G1 against the Elmarit 90 and the Elmar-C 90 (braced against
windowsill, at every aperture, uniform everything else) and the 105/2.5
notably outperformed the other two, especially wide open, but also at every
other stop down to f/16. It's an amazing lens.

VP

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Vince Passaro <passaro.vince at 
gmail.com>wrote:

> Jim
>
> The 200 f/4 is an astounding lens.
> The imbalance of heavy large lens to small tlight camera will be an
> interesting problem in the handling but i'msure you'll figure it out.
>
> If you are still looking for a great small easy to handle 135 and are
> willing to get another adapter, get the Minolta MD adapter and the Minolta
> MD 135/3.5.  The Minolta 135's are justly famous but the larger 2.8's don't
> fit your bill. The MD 135/3.5 is really small (49mm thread and perhaps 
> three
> inches long) and very very good. Available for peanuts.
>
> Vince
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:39 AM, James Laird <digiratidoc at 
> gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sonny,
>> Thanks for the sound advice. I found a Nikon 200 f4 on KEH they rated
>> EX for $49.00! It's the non-AI version but who cares...I'm gonna use
>> it on my GH1. I already have a Nikon to micro 3/4 adapter to use with
>> my 55mm Micro-Nikkor. Should be fun trying out this puppy. I've heard
>> it's a great lens.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> > Jim, I'd look in my kit and find something suitable and buy an adapter
>> for
>> > it.
>> >
>> > The Micro 4/3 stuff is pretty versatile.  I've enjoyed using my Leica R,
>> C
>> > mount,  as well as some Pentax K mount glass with adapters.
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Sonny
>> > http://www.sonc.com
>> > http://sonc.stumbleupon.com/
>> > Natchitoches, Louisiana
>> >
>> > USA
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Leica Users Group.
>> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Most portable 135)