Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 23:20:04 -0500
References: <00d601cad739$2b6382d0$822a8870$@net> <l2w19b6d42d1004081229l56214eb2la0d44aba13e93d2f@mail.gmail.com> <010d01cad77d$57229b10$0567d130$@net> <55F1C43F-C146-4125-BE52-2D477346BB2C@usjet.net>
 
Had one on a IIIg. Good little lens, really portable if a little soft  
by today's standards. I heard it was the lens that made Leica famous?

Jim

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 8, 2010, at 11:14 PM, Robert Meier <robertmeier at usjet.net> wrote:

> Does anyone have any experience with the old 3.5 cm. Elmar, an LTM  
> lens from the 30's and 40's?   Is it a decent lens, or not?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from jshul at comcast.net (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Flipping the Bird)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] 3.5 cm. Elmar)