Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:47:46 -0700
References: <w2m19b6d42d1004142233zab58c530wada2766741103218@mail.gmail.com>

The early 35mm f3.5  Summaron-M had user removable bug-eyes.
S.d.

On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:33 PM, Vince Passaro wrote:

> 1. A simple question: can the 'eyes' be easily taken off and put on the 50
> Summicron DR or is it like the 35 Summacron where you can't take it off or
> you'll wreck the lens' focusing capacity? Which is to say can't you take it
> off to use on, say, a G1, or a Bessa 2A, and put it back when you get the
> shiny M3 or M4 of your dreams?
> 
> 2. A less simple question: the ongoing thread about Leica lenses on the GF1
> began with some commentary that included language that depicted using the
> 50/1.4 on the GF1 as having a "100/1.4" lens on the camera. I see this all
> the time, the equation of the half crop with a lens twice as long. But 
> isn't
> what one has really a 50mm image with a 25% crop off all four sides? And a
> slightly narrower (more tele) angle of view? Please correct me in however
> I've gotten this wrong.  But I'm pretty sure that having a half-sized 
> sensor
> is not the same as putting a 2x converter on a full frame. It doesn't yield
> the same image at all. Why do people say this?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise)
In reply to: Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] two questions for the LUGger expertise)