Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I think all the technical differences and may be smoother skin tones etc. aside, it just means that the M3 can still take a fine image, even after 50-60 years :-) On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Peter Cheyne <geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk>wrote: > I took these two photos of my friend's son a couple of weeks ago. I was > interested to see the differences. > > M3, Kodak E100VS, Nokton 35 > http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4514083293/sizes/l/ > > M8, ISO 160, Summicron 50 > http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4492995105/sizes/l/ > > Peter > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]