Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] [IMG] Similar photos, M3 and M8
From: pasvorn at boonmark.net (Pasvorn Boonmark)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:06:58 -0700
References: <032D7C40-5821-4370-9789-D0A6EC3598CB@yahoo.co.uk>

I think the difference is that for the E100VS, you either need to run to a
lab and get it process, or DIY.
Around my area, USD $6.00 per roll => 17 cents + scanning time.

On the M8, you probably chimp it a couple of time, right? :)

That said, for this two pictures, I prefer the E100VS.


On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Peter Cheyne <geordiepete211 at 
yahoo.co.uk>wrote:

> I took these two photos of my friend's son a couple of weeks ago.  I was
> interested to see the differences.
>
> M3, Kodak E100VS, Nokton 35
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4514083293/sizes/l/
>
> M8, ISO 160, Summicron 50
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4492995105/sizes/l/
>
> Peter
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from geordiepete211 at yahoo.co.uk (Peter Cheyne) ([Leica] [IMG] Similar photos, M3 and M8)