Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks for taking a look and commenting Mark; and especially for responding to my light hearted questions. I'm not at all sure an image "needs to disturb" either. Though I've always felt strongly attracted to photographs which do, however slightly, "disturb" (probably too strong a word) in the sense of shifting my perception or creating an unexpected feeling. Regards, George Lottermoser george at imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On May 4, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Mark Pope wrote: > George, > > neither image is particularly disturbing to me. I'm not sure that > an image needs to disturb anyway. Both very enjoyable all the same. > > Sometimes I think it must be great to be a dog. > > Cheers > > Mark > > > > Mark Pope, > Swindon, Wilts > UK > > Homepage http://www.monomagic.co.uk > Blog http://www.monomagic.co.uk/blog > Picture a week (2010) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php? > gallery=paw/2010 > Picture a week (2009) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php? > gallery=paw/2009 > (2008) http://www.monomagic.co.uk/index.php? > gallery=paw/2008 > > > George Lottermoser wrote: >> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=2234> >> c&c always appreciated >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information