Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday)
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:48:07 -0400
References: <AD4D4BFD-0E48-40FA-A2C4-0380598F669A@embarqmail.com> <C8591B1A.6429F%mark@rabinergroup.com>

A photographic lie in the The Economist:

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only-a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt

<http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only-a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt>The
editor's explanation is pretty lame.

Tina

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

> If you've had a suspicious view of Photoshop from afar all these years than
> good luck!!
> Anybody whose been doing digital photography with any seriousness at all
> over the past decades and has not had his head in the sand knows that the
> equation is not
> Photoshop = Airbrush
> But:
> Photoshop = Darkroom
>
> To "Shop" an image is to print or to develop it. Not twist it.
>
> You needed a darkroom in the previous age if you wanted to develop and
> print
> your pictures.
> Now you need Photoshop.
> Does darkroom  work = lying?
> It sure could people have been dodging and burning their own view of things
> into their photo imagery from day one. The late 1800's.  Plus pre or post
> fogging or you name it. Darkroom magic. Darkroom basic technique.
> In the name normally not of un truth but of an image with more impact and
> or
> clarity. Both usually. The idea is to be able to see the  whole image
> clearly. All the detail in it. The way you did when you stood there looking
> at it with your camera in your hand at the scene. So it need to be
> carefully
> balanced. Proper sharpening is a timely topic now on the LUG and is a big
> issue now as we craft our images.
>
> In the now internet mentality there are those who want to buy and sell
> expensive gear and play with any results you get with them with a cheap
> "editing" program and expound BS like Photoshop is not for photographers or
> is for making un truths. Or is evil in any number of ways.
> Photoshop cost money and requires time.
> Photoshop is you darkroom; and the practice of using photoshop is the
> practice of  photography.
> "Craft" Strand called it.
> You can lie with it or you can tell the truth. Just like before digital in
> the 90's. Only easier. But its still up to you.
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
> it's a world of laughter, a world or tears
> its a world of hopes, its a world of fear
> theres so much that we share
> that its time we're aware
> its a small world after all
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>


-- 
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


Replies: Reply from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))