Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday)
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:34:54 -0500
References: <AD4D4BFD-0E48-40FA-A2C4-0380598F669A@embarqmail.com> <C8591B1A.6429F%mark@rabinergroup.com> <AANLkTikLZxmwMm02_mFqbH1Mohl5_QtCg0YzPoGhS-xI@mail.gmail.com>

On 7/6/2010 4:48 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> A photographic lie in the The Economist:
>
> http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only-a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt
>
> <http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/07/05/on-the-economists-cover-only-a-part-of-the-picture/?src=twt&twt=mediadecodernyt>The
> editor's explanation is pretty lame.
>
> Tina
>
>    
I agree completely.  Another reason why I think, if you weren't there, 
you will not know what actually happened.  That applies to the 
Economist, NYT, Drudge, CNN or whoever.  That is also why we pay about 
$30,000 per year for our vetted research databases.  Anyone who cites 
something from Google et al. is summarily executed.

Ken Carney
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma


In reply to: Message from ricc at embarqmail.com (Ric Carter) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Photoshopping for Truth? (and a sneaky real estate FS Friday))