Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 35 mm format is best?
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:25:43 -0700
References: <C89C5474.2535%mark@rabinergroup.com> <65926930-26E6-4BCF-8C6D-8AAC2559AA27@gmail.com>

And as far as hobby go, one can do a lot worse than photography.

On Aug 26, 2010 3:51 PM, "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I loved the appearance of Panatomic-X developed in Rodinal. I still like
the coal blacks of silver halide, and haven't been able to manipulate
digital camera images in PS to replicate that look. Now that I have only 2
hair-shedding animals in the house (down from 7), I'm going to start souping
film again. I trust that any pet hair that hasn't been vacuumed up with
stick to the emulsion of the first roll.
>
> Jeffery
>
> On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>
>> Trust me Jeffery I have long experience with Panatomic x it is my
signature
>> film. Panatomic in 35mm does not a Rolleiflex or Hasselblad make.
>> I had to prove that well known fact to myself before I started saving up
for
>> medium format systems.
>> The bottom line with film as well as digital capture is always going to
be
>> Real estate real estate real estate.
>> Acreage acreage acreage.
>> You can set your little format camera to iso 100 but as an image making
tool
>> a larger format camera is going to still blow it out of the water on a
slew
>> of accounts.
>> This is not my quirky opinion but the first thing anybody learns when
they
>> get into photography either in the classroom, in the real world, or
reading
>> a good photography book. The point in denying that is what? You don't get
to
>> play with little cameras?
>>
>> As far as this thread name goes... It is just as poorly thought out as
the
>> text which was under it.
>> 35mm is not "best" and I certainly never implied that and didn't see
anybody
>> else imply that.
>> What is "best" is not crippling yourself with a format smaller than
>> necessarily to get the shot done well.
>>
>> --------------------
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> Photography
>> mark at rabinergroup.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] 35 mm format is best?)