Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Legs
From: red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone)
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:56:19 -0700
References: <C8A163A8.28E6%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1C0D2FCE-6528-445A-AD1F-F005986CB31A@mac.com> <013101cb4904$2ad96c20$808c4460$@earthlink.net> <AANLkTik4q9-300dZouCE7r=E17ps+GerS0bfTHb5EM8B@mail.gmail.com>

OK... I wrote BELOW when I should have written ABOVE....

But you miss the point..... It has absolutely nothing to do with what he
captured, it has everything to do with HOW he captured it, and his PRESUMED
intentions.....  Presumed being the operative word......  


BTW, the center of the Porno Movie industry is Chattsworth, CA... about 20
miles from downtown LA.......

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net


Luckily, not even the woman's knees are visible then Frank! Exposing the
woman's shins and bare ankles on the WEB are bad enough. Imagine if her toes
were naked  as well!  The horror! This photo might result in lethal
injection in 12 states at least. <
http://www.hipforums.com/modules/Journal/viewentry.php?journalid=2601>
Luckily, you would never see this sort of depravity in California, I checked
and it is another debauched European, this time flaunting her own legs on
the WEB!

I can't believe what you guys are reading into this. It is NOT a photograph
up the woman's skirt. I'm pretty sure that the lady may be flattered tht you
have mentioned under 18 though!

Cheers





Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Legs)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Legs)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Legs)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Legs)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Legs)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Legs)