Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/08/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank I do understand the point that you are trying to make. I disagree with it of course. You have taken offence with what you PRESUMED and are imposing your own moral values and interpretation, which I think is more to the point. The actual content is modest and the offence is only in some viewer's minds. I'll post something on topic that may be more acceptable then http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/image/122274048 Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 1 September 2010 04:56, Frank Filippone <red735i at earthlink.net> wrote: > OK... I wrote BELOW when I should have written ABOVE.... > > But you miss the point..... It has absolutely nothing to do with what he > captured, it has everything to do with HOW he captured it, and his PRESUMED > intentions..... Presumed being the operative word...... > > > BTW, the center of the Porno Movie industry is Chattsworth, CA... about 20 > miles from downtown LA....... > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at earthlink.net > > > Luckily, not even the woman's knees are visible then Frank! Exposing the > woman's shins and bare ankles on the WEB are bad enough. Imagine if her > toes > were naked as well! The horror! This photo might result in lethal > injection in 12 states at least. < > http://www.hipforums.com/modules/Journal/viewentry.php?journalid=2601> > Luckily, you would never see this sort of depravity in California, I > checked > and it is another debauched European, this time flaunting her own legs on > the WEB! > > I can't believe what you guys are reading into this. It is NOT a photograph > up the woman's skirt. I'm pretty sure that the lady may be flattered tht > you > have mentioned under 18 though! > > Cheers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >