Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 4/3 arguments
From: neal at photoneal.com (Neal Friedenthal)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:13:58 -0400

  Seems that most of the criticism of the 4/3 system has to do with High 
ISO noise, and resolution here are a couple of shots with the Olympus e-p2;

The one of the cannons was taken at iso 1600 with an Olympus 4/3 7-14mm 
at 7mm,

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/neal+f/misc+photos/artgar+_1+of+1_.jpg.html

The second, the flag, taken at iso 400 with a Leica 50mm f1.4 Summilux

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/neal+f/misc+photos/flag+_1+of+1__1.jpg.html

scan down the left side of the flag image on the enlarged version.


Replies: Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] 4/3 arguments)