Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2010/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] (no subject)
From: images at comporium.net (Tina Manley)
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:22:21 -0400
References: <6dfcba4d5bb89631f368bb1fb8f9032a.squirrel@mail.threshinc.com> <AANLkTikJQ4oFGQEzfhQ+8Z9MVL=v7rHaPLg7dmxoFXNi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=GcQxocLmj7S_HS7VErgYvpH6og7GL8+5Hn_O4@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=9O9oVBWcMOLPoamSgvjrjGTNq-y7Ui6aa6tJG@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinaox3qYyX2pWy3mX0HogqgZkiru9cE=K_TYQ-b@mail.gmail.com>
Check it out:
http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/unsuitable-cameras.asp
<http://www.alamy.com/contributor/help/unsuitable-cameras.asp>Tina
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at
gmail.com>wrote:
> Tina, you will know the difference, but the buyers of your photographs
> in the art market wont know and wont care. I cannot believe that stock
> agencies will accept Leica, but not the equivalent Nikon or Canon
> either. So it is no big competitive advantage.
>
> Cheers
> Jayanand
>
>
> --
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] (no subject))
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (no subject))
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] (no subject))
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] (no subject))
In reply to:
Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] (no subject))
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] (no subject))