Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?
From: hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:56:15 +0430
 
On a trip to Qarabagh, in the country north of Kabul today, we visited  
the office of an English language school, where we had tea:

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/Afghanistan_001/Tea+for+one+or+tea+for+two++004.jpg.html
 
 >

and

<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Hugh+Thompson/Afghanistan_001/Tea+for+one+or+tea+for+two++005.jpg.html
 
 >

Hugh

C&Ss most welcome


"Keep cheerful and smile, sometimes it is all you have"

hewthompson at mac.com
Kabul, Afghanistan
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)
Reply from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)
Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)
Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] IMG: Tea for one, or tea for two?)