Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Daniel's Comments on a Leica EVIL Camera at LHSA Wetzlar
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 00:00:45 +0200
References: <AANLkTikPFOZP1onFMe1JA=RGNy0774mhVrgqLV6oUYqD@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimLTL38tN89bA6rjZaX01ERD3VU7wEf0WQDVkCN@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinuFys3b4TRNYObgU=HBD4-BJV2z7wZ+BaiSZ-F@mail.gmail.com> <4CAC3E47.40806@gmx.de> <AANLkTi=UwbX-rOMWAs-qjvJr7fTD58aGA8QeMMrTy8GE@mail.gmail.com> <DF031629-37AD-4513-9C42-0EC7F6A73CF1@comcast.net>

Getting too old for an LHSA event? No way, Dick!
Did anyone in the party actually take any pictures?

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

YNWA





On Oct 6, 2010, at 3:32 PM, Richard Taylor wrote:

> Stefan Daniel was asked about the "R Solution" at the LHSA meeting and he 
> replied with what I felt was considerable regret that it was economically 
> unfeasible given the current competition in the DSLR market.  But, ... 
> 
> He went on to talk about the development of a *full-frame* camera with an 
> EVF that would be primarily directed at M users but that would also take R 
> lenses with an adapter.  They are also considering development of a line 
> of autofocus lenses for this camera.  Let's hope they don't snatch defeat 
> from the jaws of victory on this one like they did with the X-1.
> 
> Another tidbit:  Leica, at least for its M lenses, remains committed to 
> the development of lenses that are fully corrected optically - no firmware 
> corrections, please. 
> 
> By far the most interesting thing at Photokina was the new Fuji X100 that 
> Fuji was showing in mockup only but with an operating viewfinder.  The 
> optical finder had projected frame lines and minimal info (shutter speed, 
> f-stop and ISO) so it was nicely uncluttered. A flick of a switch converts 
> the finder to an EVF.  It uses an APS-C sensor and I saw nothing to make 
> me think the frame lines were parallax corrected.  Cool, nevertheless!  
> It's about the size of a GF-1.  It looks like an interesting camera and I 
> look forward to seeing some images from it.
> 
> The Wetzlar meeting was a lot of fun, but having signed up for *all* the 
> tours I ended the week walked out and considerably tired.  Maybe I'm just 
> getting too old for this kind of stuff.  :-)      
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Dick
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 06, 2010, at 5:35 AM, Richard Man wrote:
> 
>> Ah, so it's not even "may be we will look at it in 2 years, but NEVER" :-(
>> 
>> (well not that I use the R systems, but seeing stuff from Doug and George,
>> clearly there is something there there)
>> 
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Douglas Sharp <douglas.sharp at gmx.de> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I quote:
>>> 
>>> R-SYSTEM
>>> A digital solution in the form of a R10 was not presentable. Such an
>>> investment would have been to great for Leica. The development of the
>>> S-System cost ?30m. A similar effort for a digital R was not fundable.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Not presentable (nicht darstellbar) should be "not feasible" - it's an
>>> expression often used by engineers - so what was actually meant above was
>>> 
>>> "we took a look at the idea and shelved it 'cos we couldn't afford it in 
>>> a
>>> month of Sundays, and it wouldn't be profitable even if we could"
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Douglas
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 06.10.2010 06:00, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Absolutely understandable disappointment for R lens owners of course.
>>>> However the expectaiton for a 'solution' this Photokina came entirely 
>>>> from
>>>> speculation and desire rather than specific promise. All largely
>>>> unremarked
>>>> here but there has been an awful lot of anguish and emotional 
>>>> outpouring,
>>>> dummy spitting, rants and stompimg out of the room in the (dedicated) L
>>>> Camera Forum.
>>>> 
>>>> Stefan Daniel told us in mid 2009 that they were working on the 
>>>> 'suitable
>>>> solution' but not to expect it before this Photokina etc.  That of 
>>>> course
>>>> has now slipped further but at least they have provided some slightly 
>>>> more
>>>> specific information on the possible form that it may take (in general
>>>> terms). I think that Leica Camera have learnt a lesson there and are 
>>>> less
>>>> likely to provide any specific models and developments that are only
>>>> planned
>>>> or not.
>>>> According to an attendee at the LHSA meeting in Wtezlar Leica management
>>>> have now excluded the possible solution prior to photokina 2012.
>>>> Personally I am still stunned tht the S2 development costs were some 30
>>>> million EURO and I note their comment that other medium format camera
>>>> manufacturers occupied something like 50% less floor space at pk. Not a
>>>> reassuring indicator for the genre, if unsurprising.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Geoff
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 6 October 2010 13:33, Jayanand Govindaraj<jayanand at gmail.com>  
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like they are working overtime to 'repair their finances' for the
>>>>> time
>>>>> being. Can't blame them for that, it is a pragmatic business decision.
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Jayanand
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Geoff Hopkinson<hopsternew at gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Andy Barton, a MOD on the L Camera Forum has posted a summary of
>>>>>> 
>>>>> responses
>>>>> 
>>>>>> from Leica Camera Executives to a number of questions on Leica 
>>>>>> products
>>>>>> 
>>>>> and
>>>>> 
>>>>>> policy.
>>>>>> You can read it here, even if not a meber of that forum
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/customer-forum/144758-leica-luf-%40-pkina-english.html
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>> Geoff
>>>>>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
>> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
>> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all 
>> previous
>> replies in your msgs. ]
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Daniel's Comments on a Leica EVIL Camera at LHSA Wetzlar)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Translation of question and answer session with Leica Camera executives)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Translation of question and answer session with Leica Camera executives)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Translation of question and answer session with Leica Camera executives)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Translation of question and answer session with Leica Camera executives)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Translation of question and answer session with Leica Camera executives)
Message from r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor) ([Leica] Daniel's Comments on a Leica EVIL Camera at LHSA Wetzlar)