Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I meant longer :-) sorry. That applies to M9 :-) On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote: > Eh? I would think 35mm and wider would need the most correction, > therefore, need coding. > > Or is "above" equal to "longer"? > > Then I would agree, 35mm and longer would need less correction. > > Oh, but that was for the M8 smaller sensor. What about full frame - are > you back to needing correction at, say, 50mm? > > Pretty obvious I don't have an M9. > > Vick > > > > > On 10/23/2010 10:14 PM, Richard Man wrote: > >> 35mm or above lens really don't need coding. >> >> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:02 PM, James Laird<digiratidoc at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Can anyone tell me if the 40 Summicron is included in the lens >>> database of the M9, or are just the newer lenses in the database? Sure >>> would be nice if I can ever afford an M9 as it's one of my favorite >>> lenses. I'd use it anyway of course;-) >>> >>> James Laird >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]