Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I tested one on the M9 and film in 2009. As I posted somewhere else, the 0.95 has much more contrast, flatter field, less vignetting, much less focus shift but much more flare. Stopped down it's even better than the 50/1.4 asph, but the higher flare killed any temptation for me. Marty On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:52 AM, leo wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote: > So Vick, > > How does the .95 compare to the 1? > > Leo Wesson > Photographer/Videographer > 817.733.9157 > www.leowesson.com > > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko at sympatico.ca> wrote: >> Oh my god, I love this lens >> >> First shot here - and you can imagine, he ain't still for long..... >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/vickko/Noctilux_095/Christmas+2010-1000293.jpg.html >> >> Vick >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >