Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/03/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com)
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:27:31 -0600 (CST)

Only a Beemer from 2005 or earlier.  The new ones are time bombs, unless you 
do maintenance it with greater frequency than BMW calls for.
Cheers,
Gene

----- Original Message -----
From: "H&ECummer" <cummer at netvigator.com>
To: lug at leica-users.org
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2011 7:04:14 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF


> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:12:20 -0600
> From: Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Seriously OT: Jaguar XF?
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>
> I bought my wife an XJ-6 one year.  Everyone told me not to do it.   
> They
> were right.  I would say "suspect quality issues" is a masterful
> understatement.
>
> Ken

I had a Jag E type V 12 convertible when I lived in LA. I was single  
and it was the greatest crumpet collector known to man. But, it ran  
hot in the summer time and the transistor ignition seated between the  
cylinder banks melted and incapacitated the car. I suggest buying a  
beemer instead.
Howard


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Seriously OT - Jaguary XF)