Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] DOF of 80/1.4 at 1.4 slimmer than 50mm at 1.4?
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:28:59 -0500
References: <BLU0-SMTP63FFBE73F8419F8D7EEA128CA80@phx.gbl><C9C90568.D216%mark@rabinergroup.com> <BANLkTin1=bou3XDpDviKAsVQs4UnqRCnhQ@mail.gmail.com>

Very nice images, Marty.  I see, in 843, it was hard to get both the eyes 
and the teeth in focus, while in 845, you nailed it.  With a subject like 
that, one good shot is enough!

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marty Deveney" <benedenia at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] DOF of 80/1.4 at 1.4 slimmer than 50mm at 1.4?


>I recently got an R5 and an 80/1.4 (again).  The R5 doesn't help much
> - the viewfinder on the R8/9/DMR is brighter, bigger and snaps into
> focus better - but yes, focusing that thing is hard.  These:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/freakscene/Rachel/ were shot with a
> Nikon 85/1.4 and a Leica 80/1.4 (about half and half - with an Re for
> the Leica and an FA and an F100 for the Nikkor).  But there are plenty
> of frames on the 5 or so rolls I shot of Rachel that day where the
> focus isn't right.  I used f1.4 because we were in my old house using
> window light because it was 5C and raining outside.  Sometimes you use
> what you have, and get what you get.
>
> Marty
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] DOF of 80/1.4 at 1.4 slimmer than 50mm at 1.4?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] DOF of 80/1.4 at 1.4 slimmer than 50mm at 1.4?)
Message from benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney) ([Leica] DOF of 80/1.4 at 1.4 slimmer than 50mm at 1.4?)