Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WAS : Barcelona in color
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:14:26 +0530
References: <BANLkTimw-ABFB5jc=_VAa2FJMt8Y7SHCVw@mail.gmail.com> <8B41A546BA954F64BADF8B83BDCC7733@syneticfeba505> <610505AD-EF4C-4779-8EF3-9FE0ECEE683D@frozenlight.eu> <7BCE86D3-30DC-48D9-8B52-2F993D8F1171@sfr.fr>

Philippe,
Both the songs are familiar - the second is definitely "I Will Wait For You"
- what is the name of the first? The voices seem dubbed, and the style owes
a lot to Jon Hendricks and Manhattan Transfer, I am sure I have heard one of
them sing it.

Nathan,
Brilliant photograph.

Cheers
Jayanand

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 4:40 PM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at 
sfr.fr>wrote:

> Beautifully balanced composition and tones - it sings!
>
> In between Fred Astair and a crossbreed of
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uopjMuYY3F8
> and
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JS4JMY0JWM
>
> Rain sometimes helps a photog,
> in that respect I should feel a happy camper ;-)
>
> Great great photo Nathan
>
> Amiti?s
> Philippe
>
> Le 15 avr. 11 ? 09:02, Nathan Wajsman a ?crit :
>
>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> I wonder if you are thinking about this one, from Seville in 2003 or 2004?
>>
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu/fotosevilla/night/content/L2004_14_12_large.html
>>
>> That was one of my most-commented-upon pictures ever.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nathan
>>
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>
>> YNWA
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 15, 2011, at 8:43 AM, <tedgrant at shaw.ca> <tedgrant at shaw.ca> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Lawrence Zeitlin offered
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Barcelona in color
>>>
>>>
>>>  Nathan,
>>>> Not trolling at all. I was just curious. Many of the pictures that you
>>>> post
>>>> in and around Alicante are about people too, yet you usually shoot in
>>>> color.<<<,
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Larry,
>>> That may be true, however some of Nathan's more spectacular photographs
>>> over the years have been people in B&W! There is one I recall from 
>>> several
>>> years ago at night with a few people on the street. I believe Madrid?
>>> Barcelona? Or some other location prior to his moving to Alicante? It was
>>> most eye catching simply because it was in  B&W!
>>>
>>>  I reject Dr. Ted's pat aphorism that when you photograph people in
>>>> color,
>>>> you photograph their clothes but when you shoot B&W you photograph their
>>>> soul. <<<
>>>>
>>>
>>> Be my guest and reject all you like my friend. :-) However let me give an
>>> example.:-) True incident in the UK several years ago.
>>>
>>> Two photographers with a portrait studio decided they'd only shoot B&W
>>> portraits. They completely renovated the studio front windows, 
>>> re-opening as
>>> a B&W portraits only! In the front exhibit space they placed beautiful 
>>> B&W
>>> portrait prints and advertised they only did their portraits in B&W.
>>>
>>> Clients who insisted on colour were offered B&W or the doorway! One would
>>> think them a bit looney given this was the beginning of a new operation 
>>> and
>>> one would surely want every dollar possible.
>>>
>>> However? Given it being a very fine portrait studio originally with a
>>> great number of clients prior to the change over. Within the first three
>>> months they tripled the gross income shooting only B&W! Whatever it is 
>>> about
>>> B&W drew a wonderful new clientele.
>>>
>>> Actually the difference is the "content" creates which is greater in many
>>> cases.
>>>
>>> Disasters generally look worse in B&W simply because the content is
>>> usually violent and death! Of course not in every case. What is the B&W
>>> photograph that comes to mind from Vietnam? I have two without question.
>>> Eddie Adams photo of the police officer shooting the VC through the head 
>>> and
>>> the young girl running away from the Napalm with her clothes and body 
>>> burnt.
>>> Vivid B&W both! And colour wouldn't have added anything!
>>>
>>>  Imagine Matthew Brady's problem trying to photograph the US Civil war in
>>>>> color using the wet collodion process.<<
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> I doubt they'd be any better! As most are "classic content" images to
>>> start with, so I doubt colour would've improved them at all.  Regardless 
>>> of
>>> the technical situation. Along those lines if we compare the dramatic B&W
>>> movies of the past, quite often these days we see with "colour added." 
>>> Quite
>>> frankly they look quite horrid as the colour adds absolutely nothing, but
>>> almost destroys the craftsmanship of the lighting people and camera 
>>> angles .
>>>
>>> Colour can in many cases, be a complete distraction from the content. As
>>> I understand photography, it's the content that is the most important 
>>> part
>>> of the photograph.  That is unless one is dabbling strictly in colour for
>>> colour sake.
>>>
>>> So Larry mon ami it's basically "to each his own." I shoot colour when
>>> the assignment is to be shot in colour and B&W when the assignment is for
>>> B&W re-production. I would offer, of the 100,000 images in the National
>>> Gallery of Canada collection they are all B&W documentary images. The
>>> 280,000 images in the National Archives of Canada collection? It's 
>>> probably
>>> 75% B&W, 25% colour. Again simply because of the assignment and whether
>>> magazine assignments, travel or tourism or whether the client asked
>>> specifically to shoot in whatever medium.
>>>
>>> I suppose if you owned one of my published medical books, "This is Our
>>> Work. The Legacy of Sir William Osler" "Doctor's Work" or "Women in
>>> Medicine. A celebration of their Work."  You might have a better
>>> understanding what I mean: "When you photograph people in colour, you
>>> photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you
>>> photograph their souls!"
>>>
>>> And as far as digital? Quite often I use my Digilux 2 set to shoot B&W
>>> and I get some very interesting B&W images. Actually the really cool 
>>> thing
>>> is, looking through the viewfinder at a B&W world and "Click!" A B&W 
>>> image
>>> right out of the camera! :-)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Dr. ted :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] WAS : WAS WAS Barcelona in color)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Barcelona in color)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] WAS : Barcelona in color)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] WAS : Barcelona in color)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] WAS : Barcelona in color)