Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What's the big fuss? Color vs, B&W
From: kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner)
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:20:26 -0700
References: <BANLkTinw1N8Sv2V0C+VT4zT37fa2ZVZeHQ@mail.gmail.com>

Tell more about the 99c lens. Fascinating.

Herbg


>Seems like I miss the beginning of yet another discussion.
>
>No matter, Eggleston showed us color is the new B&W.
>
>Mundane can be art, and once it's art, it's art.
>
>Warhol is monochromatic. In B&W? Not so much art.
>
>Some use Leica, some use Canon, yet others use Olympus.
>
>.... Or even a Hasselblad Flexbody with digital back
>
>I know someone who uses 99 cents (!) lens on his Leica M9.
>
>Some say color is best, some say only B&W is true photography.
>
>I say, as long as there is an image out there
>
>keep clicking that shutter.
>
>--
>// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
>// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
>// photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
>[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
>replies in your msgs. ]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Herbert Kanner
kanner at acm.org
650-326-8204

Do not meddle in the affairs of cats,
for they are subtle and will pee
on your computer!


Replies: Reply from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] What's the big fuss? Color vs, B&W)
In reply to: Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] What's the big fuss? Color vs, B&W)